18 Dec
2011
18 Dec
'11
1:08 p.m.
on Sun Dec 18 2011, "Vicente J. Botet Escriba" <vicente.botet-AT-wanadoo.fr> wrote:
Le 17/12/11 23:12, Dave Abrahams a écrit :
on Thu Dec 15 2011, Vicente Botet<vicente.botet-AT-wanadoo.fr> wrote:
IMO scope and convertibility are orthogonal. Do you know why this combination was not retained? I'm afraid that I don't even understand your question... but even if I did, I'm pretty sure I wouldn't know the answer.
Why C++11 doesn't supports scoped enums with underlying type that are implicitly convertible to the underlying type?
You're asking the wrong guy. I suggest finding out who wrote the standard proposals (you can find the paper and credits at http://open-std.org). -- Dave Abrahams BoostPro Computing http://www.boostpro.com