Op 19-1-2011 18:20, Stewart, Robert schreef:
Dean Michael Berris wrote:
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 12:46 AM, Joel Falcou <joel.falcou@lri.fr> wrote:
On 19/01/11 17:31, Denis Shevchenko wrote:
19.01.2011 20:27, Barend Gehrels пишет:
For a library not (yet) in boost, cpp-netlib is appropriate.
As soon as it is in boost, Boost.Net?
+1. Boost.Network ?? I think Boost.Network works, but Boost.Net is maybe sexier. :D I dislike the suggestion of .NET evoked by Boost.Net. It suggests that Boost is into .NET development!
Yeah, I realized that after hitting the send button. Anyway, both C++ and C# are case-sensitive, so probably no problem ;-) Besides that, I would like to have in .NET such a wonderful, peer-reviewed, Open Source, pretty-licensed, well-known, reliable, community-driven collection, as Boost is (Boost.NET?) Regards, Barend