Re: [boost] Non-thread-safe thread library (Boost.Function)

Phil Endecott <spam_from_boost_dev <at> chezphil.org> writes:

In November Sergey Skorniakov wrote to this list asking about the non-thread-safety of Boost.Function and consequently of Boost.Thread itself. Steven Watanbee replied pointing out that the problem is resolved in the trunk.

Irrespective of any fixes applied to boost.Function, this has been fixed in the trunk --- boost.thread no longer depends on boost.function. Anthony