14 Mar
2005
14 Mar
'05
2:18 p.m.
"Daniel James" <daniel@calamity.org.uk> wrote in message news:d1409a$kc1$1@sea.gmane.org... | If Thorsten writes ptr_unordered_set<base> then there might be a problem | with boost::hash<base>. Although it will equally apply to | std::equal_to<base>. yeah, I defiintely will do so at some point. I'm thinking ptr_unordered_set sounds worse than unordered_ptr_set, but the former would be more of what we expect. Anyway, ptr_XX generally forwards to the underlying object and not the pointers, but when it comes to hash-functions I can see no good reason for this not to be based on the pointer itself. -Thorsten