"Ilya Sokolov" <fal_delivery@mail.ru> wrote in message news:fkuive$ijf$1@ger.gmane.org...
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
>> 2. Unfortunately original test modult function signature is unacceptable for DLL initialization. So i had to introduce new one. [snip] I still don't see why is it unacceptable. Can you state it explicitly?
Hmm. How to state it more explicitly. How about this:
It does not link.
i.e., boost::unit_test::test_suite* init_unit_test_suite( int, char* [] ) link, but bool init_unit_test() doesn't link?
Quite the opposite. Original testrunner/initialization function signatures cause Boost.Test fail to build as DLL.
Problem arise with library that should work on both platforms, with and without dll support.
What platforms are you talking about?
dos/djgpp
I am not sure Boost.Test and/or Boost support these. What compiler r u using? Do we run regression tests on these?
Why the solutions I provided are not satisfactory?
they are too complex for such simple problem
The problem is far from being simple and what is complicated in solution I recomended? Gennadiy