13 Dec
2006
13 Dec
'06
2:25 p.m.
Deane Yang <deane_yang@yahoo.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Deane Yang <deane_yang@yahoo.com> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
Lots of reasons: easier installation, I happen to know it really well since we wrote C++TMP in it, more sensible parsing rules, I have complete and working emacs syntax coloring (makes a huge difference), shorter toolchain, a great path to PDFs (please don't say "FOP").
Are all of these things already available in boost somewhere?
I don't understand what you mean. What things?
You answered this pretty well below, but what about the emacs mode for rst? Is that available somewhere?
I think it's in the docutils contrib/ tree, but Google will find it. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com