1 Sep
2013
1 Sep
'13
9:08 p.m.
On Monday 02 September 2013 00:04:15 you wrote:
On Sunday 01 September 2013 21:13:08 Domagoj Saric wrote:
Given that one of the main 'points' of intrusive_ptr is efficiency, forcing a virtual destructor is IMO completely misguided. Policies that would (also) allow CRTP+protected-destructor and custom deleters would make a more complete product.
CRTP version might be a good addition. Care to submit?
Actually, I liked that idea so much that I have changed the implementation to follow that design. Thanks for the suggestion. https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/changeset/85547