On 23 April 2010 04:29, Aleksey Gurtovoy <agurtovoy@meta-comm.com> wrote:
On Thu, 22 Apr 2010 03:10:30 -0500, Daniel James <dnljms@gmail.com> >>
The release process is quite different now. It seems to me that the focus is to get a regular release with the more modest goal of being an incremental improvement, rather than an 'all green' release.
Like Robert, I don't see a conflict here. The "all green" part is exactly about incremental improvement: it says "this release is not worse than the previous one, except for these known issues". It was simply a concise, objective, easy-to-track and easy-to-explain criterion to keep us on track towards that goal.
I didn't claim that it conflicts, just that it isn't a requirement for incremental improvement and that it slows down releases and increases work for the release managers. It might be easy to track and explain, but not necessarily to achieve. Daniel