Re: [boost] Threads Documentation degradation v1.32 -> v1.33

"Job Mulder" <Job@xsens.com> writes:

There appear to be a lot of missing words in the 1.33 version of the Boost.Threads documentation. Most notably, all "Boost.Threads" terms seem to have been removed from all the pages. This makes the document somewhat hard to read...

I knew the threads library needed more attention than it was getting, but IMO, this is unacceptable for the release. Can something be done about it? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com