David Abrahams wrote:
Johan Paulsson <boost.org@kuodo.com> writes:
In this case, with the compilers I used, I do not see a big difference in quality of the error message.
Of course not, especially because in this case you seem to have left out all but the very useless ASSERT(false) case.
I can find two problems with what I posted. First: I do not mention that the compilations instantiate the code with the compile-time assertions with booth traits_::base = 10 and traits_::base = 16. I suppose this means booth the ASSERT(true) and ASSERT(false) case. Second: My use of: BOOST_MPL_ASSERT((::boost::mpl::integral_c<bool, traits_::base == 10>)); could be improved to something similar to: BOOST_MPL_ASSERT((base_not_10<traits_::base>)); This would produce a compiler error containing something similar to: 'assertion_failed(mpl_::failed************ base_not_10<16>::************)' I think this would have been better as it is similar to what I used with my own implementation. Please accept my apologies. I have removed all files from <http://www.kuodo.com/code/assert/deep/> because I feel they can not be used for a fair comparation of the error messages. If there are more issues, please tell me. The last thing I want to do is upset anyone or spread false information, if I have I am sorry. Thank You, Johan Paulsson