6 Jan
2012
6 Jan
'12
2:55 p.m.
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Mathias Gaunard < mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
On 01/06/2012 03:43 PM, Jim Bell wrote:
Though this isn't news, I just came across it and it speaks to our common problem. (And it's of interest to boost users in general.) Note that ARM and Sun are even invested in stdcxx to some extent.
Future plans:
Unless the issue with contributions can be resolved in the next quarter I suggest to retire the project.
Cannot libc++ replace whatever role stdcxx had?
What is 'libc++'? I'm unsure of my ground here, but isn't any given libc++ specific to some (group of) vendors or platforms, whereas stdc++ sought to be cross platform and open source? - Rob.