6 Mar
2009
6 Mar
'09
12:42 a.m.
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 9:26 PM, Matt Calabrese <rivorus@gmail.com> wrote:
I wouldn't. If you really want to use one macro only, I would use the PP sequence instead.
I'm gonna be the rebel and say that I think how it's currently implemented is [unfortunately] the most functional and most portable option,
Actually I agree with you too. I just meant that I think the PP sequence would be better than using a vararg macro. Though I didn't know that it has a hard limit of 256 elements. [snip]
While I agree that the current interface is kind of ugly, I still think it's the best option available.
I don't really mind the current interface. What I find uglier is using a macro to use the enum type.
-- -Matt Calabrese
Regards, -- Felipe Magno de Almeida