11 Jun
2005
11 Jun
'05
9:44 a.m.
Well, all changes may (in certain circumstances) keep a reviewer from "fully evaluating the library". Some clarification of the guidelines would not be amiss.
Apologies for being behind the curve with this, but ideally you would have left the original review version unchanged, and posted an "_updated" version that folks could look at if they wanted. However, now it's done probably best to leave it as it is, otherwise we'll get even more churn. John.