On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 2:34 AM, Joel Falcou <joel.falcou@u-psud.fr> wrote:
Daniel Walker a écrit :
That sounds great. Nice that you handle constness. I would suggest adding support for volatility, as well, but yeah, sounds good so far.
I'll surely look like some big noobie but ... volatility on methods ?
Member functions can be overloaded on const and volatile - so called cv-qualification. So, it would be good to handle each of the following, for example. struct t { void f(); void f() const; void f() volatile; void f() const volatile; }; I can help after I take a look at your implementation. <snip>
I'll do my lil' package and upload it during the day.
OK, no rush. I won't be able to get to this until this weekend, really. Thanks! Daniel Walker