Gennaro Prota wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jul 2006 13:06:03 -0500, Rene Rivera
While your in there changing MPL docs, could you do us the favor of adding some of the missing copyright+license information. MPL is *1* in the number of those issues.
Rene, next time we should remember to run the inspect tool (and fix its discoveries :-)) before branching for release, so that we don't have to duplicate all corrections on head and branch.
Historically it hasn't made a difference when we run the inspect tool. People mostly ignored it and hence why we have an accumulation problems now. Now perhaps that it's in the form of a constant nagging email instead of a web page people will pay attention (cross-fingers). As for the amount of work I don't think libraries have diverged that much between HEAD and RC so it's likely not that much work since one only has to merge to the RC branch.
Or maybe the inspect tool should run once a week or so, in general.
Not sure about the schedule, but definitely it will running all the time from now on. I haven't enabled runs of it in HEAD yet as I expect that would generate a somewhat larger set of issues. But perhaps we could start such runs on HEAD on a weekly schedule? (Did a test run, and the *LC* email on HEAD would exceed the 75K limit. Only by a hair though.)
PS: maybe we want to highlight this in a separate thread?
Yep :-) -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com -- 102708583/icq - grafikrobot/aim - grafikrobot/yahoo