On Thursday, September 01, 2011 06:05:27 PM John Maddock wrote:
BTW I couldn't find any examples of using proto::function in a grammar, it wasn't obvious to me what it's template arguments should be, or indeed whether this actually enabled the function call operator rather than my use case?
Just keep in mind, that proto::function is a expression that can have variadic children. The first is the function expression, and the remaining the function arguments. proto::vararg might help here.
Got it, this needs to be documented under http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_47_0/doc/html/boost/proto/function.html though, and an example wouldn't harm either ;-)
Have a look here: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_47_0/doc/html/proto/users_guide.html#boost_p...
John.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost