28 Sep
2012
28 Sep
'12
1:18 p.m.
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012 04:24:53 +0000 (UTC) Gennadiy Rozenal <rogeeff@gmail.com> wrote:
Ian Emmons <iemmons <at> bbn.com> writes:
I can't speak for Paul, of course, but I would like it if I could build Boost.Test libraries (libboost_unit_test_framework*) without the monitor stuff (libboost_test_exec_monitor* and libboost_prg_exec_monitor*).
Is this a joke? Former is deprecated long ago and later has nothing to do with unit testing. And either one has nothing to do with unit test framework. The point here that both libs are built by ./b2 --with-test. And considering what you said above it would be nice if they were considered a separate lib for purposes of --with-whatever..