9 Dec
2006
9 Dec
'06
2:26 p.m.
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
With respect to http://www.boost-consulting.com/boost/more/separate_compilation.html, I note that:
* It needs to be updated for BBv2
* It has a rationale section called "Why static linking by default?" but that's the first mention of static linking in the document. Is there a section missing?
Also, I know we've been over this before, but is there a good reason we can't use more descriptive names than BOOST_XXX_NO_LIB ? It seems to me that BOOST_XXX_NO_AUTO_LINK would be more suitable. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com