Re: [boost] interest in a "signal flow" library?

These operator overloads for connecting multiple signals seem too cutesy and confusing. How often do these long chains of signals get connected together? I would imagine at most a dozen such chains for a complex application but maybe I'm wrong. Braddock brings up good points and I find his imagePipeline function much easier to read (it will also almost certainly be easier to debug and to mentally assure myself of correctness). - Michael Marcin