On Thursday, July 2, 2009, Scott McMurray <me22.ca+boost@gmail.com> wrote:
2009/7/2 Stewart, Robert <Robert.Stewart@sig.com>:
Why not with the syntax Dave has been suggesting:
converter<int>(locale_ = loc, throw_ = true).from(str, 0);
To me, that's the nicest one yet proposed.
I think that the only complaint was that it limits the number of params, whereas the other version does not. But if you have more than 10 params, I think you have bigger problems.
And it'd be quite reasonable, instead of statics, to just use
I didn't see that as a static, but as a constructor call.
convert<int>().from(str, 0), since that's already common from function objects.
And actually, why not spell from() as operator(), so it can be a proper function object?
transform( istream_iterator<string>(cin), istream_iterator<string>(), back_inserter(v), convert<int>(locale_ = loc, base_ = 16, throw_ = false, default_ = 0)); _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost