Re: [boost] [forward_declare] Interest Inquiry toward Faster Compile Times

On Thursday 02 August 2012 00:50:26 Daniel Larimer wrote:

Simply including boost::aligned_storage adds 1600 lines of code to be processed, most of it totally irrelevant to the task of aligned storage. I would want to implement aligned storage with much less overhead.

The primary goal is to accelerate compile times and including anything from boost::mpl (which alligned_storage does) starts to pile on the code.

If you can create a slim equivalent of aligned_storage, I think we could simply replace the current implementation.