27 Jun
2005
27 Jun
'05
12:50 a.m.
David Abrahams <dave@boost-consulting.com> writes:
<http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/boost/boost/libs/type_traits/test/decay_test.cpp?r1=1.1&r2=1.2&sortby=date> <http://tinyurl.com/ap7uc>
Seems to have caused it. But Dave's comment on the change doesn't say which "Broken compiler" the change was for.
Sorry, it was one of the VC++s; 6 I think. I figured omitting the void would work anywhere. Well, you're probably safe by optionally including the void when on CW, yes?
Aw, there's no way that test could work without PTS. I have no clue what I was thinking when I checked in those changes. Reverted, with apologies. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com