13 Oct
2009
13 Oct
'09
7:32 p.m.
AMDG Jean-Louis Leroy wrote:
Speaking of Boost, the "detail" namespace is commonly used for implementation details, same as "aux" (or variations thereof), so this is a good choice if you're writing a new library for Boost.
I may stick to the tradition (actually I'm doing that for now) but if we always limited ourselves to common usage, Boost would not exist to start with would it ? ;-)
Sure, but there's not much point to innovating for irrelevant details. In Christ, Steven Watanabe