24 Jul
2004
24 Jul
'04
3:38 p.m.
David Abrahams wrote:
"Peter Dimov" <pdimov@mmltd.net> writes:
Matt Hurd wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2004 08:31:18 +1000, Batov, Vladimir <vladimir.batov@ca.com> wrote:
How 'bout
scoped_lock lk1(m, defer); scoped_lock lk2(m, try);
no comment except that perhaps scoped_lock can be dropped for just lock. scoped_lock seems so twentieth century ;-)
I like scoped_lock because of:
scoped_lock<> lock( m );
I prefer to be able to name the lock variable 'lock' instead of 'lk'.
Suit yourself, but I think variable names should denote roles, not types.
Hm. What is it that makes 'lock' not qualify as a role?