Hi,
I thought you were talking about a set of macros??? It is a set of macro because there is also a 'breakable if' and also 'breakable else'.
However, the idea is sufficient for me, I can just declare the macro myself Yes, I can understand that : I used to do the same than boost::non_copiable.. But I don't want to keep good ideas for myself.
There is clearly no technical difficulties here. It's more declaring : "there is an interesting way of programming some tedius tasks that use if/else/ do while contructs everywhere". Best regards, Pierre --- En date de : Dim 6.9.09, Thomas Klimpel <Thomas.Klimpel@synopsys.com> a écrit : De: Thomas Klimpel <Thomas.Klimpel@synopsys.com> Objet: Re: [boost] [Boost.Breakable] Any interest in a Boost Breakable library? À: "boost@lists.boost.org" <boost@lists.boost.org> Date: Dimanche 6 Septembre 2009, 11h04 Pierre Morcello wrote:
Indeed, the macro as I use it right now is even less optimised than a GOTO or a do...while(false) : it's currently just a simple 'for' loop in a macro..
I thought you were talking about a set of macros??? Apart from that, I like the idea. However, the idea is sufficient for me, I can just declare the macro myself, so no need for a library. Regards, Thomas _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost