I thought it may be some bad conditionalization in the Boost sources for gcc 3.4, but preprocessed file generated by gcc 3.4.2 compiles just fine with gcc 4.2.1. So, it really looks like a bug/feature of gcc 3.4 series. FWIW, Boris ----- Original Message ----- From: "Boris Gubenko" <Boris.Gubenko@hp.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Cc: "Boris Gubenko" <Boris.Gubenko@hp.com> Sent: Monday, November 19, 2007 8:56 AM Subject: Re: [boost] [Bimap][1.35] Regressions problems in Sun-5.9 and HP-UX
Matias Capeletto wrote:
There are a some regression problems for Boost.Bimap running on SunOS and HP-UX.
On HP-UX, it is only on the machine using gcc 3.4.2. From the website, it seems to me that gcc 3.4 series has a problem with bimap library.
I'll see if I can spot something obvious. In the meantime, if you have access to a machine with gcc 3.4.x, any platform, you can investigate yourself. If gcc 3.4 is indeed the culprit, the tests will fail to compile.
Thanks, Boris
----- Original Message ----- From: "Matias Capeletto" <matias.capeletto@gmail.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Sunday, November 18, 2007 12:14 AM Subject: [boost] [Bimap][1.35] Regressions problems in Sun-5.9 and HP-UX
Hi,
There are a some regression problems for Boost.Bimap running on SunOS and HP-UX.
Detailed report: http://boost.org/regression/trunk/developer/issues.html
[ sun-5.9 ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- assign, foreach, lambda, property_map, range, serialization test_bimap_assign, test_bimap_convenience_header, test_bimap_info test_bimap_lambda, test_bimap_modify, test_bimap_mutable test_bimap_operator_bracket, test_bimap_ordered, test_bimap_project test_bimap_property_map, test_bimap_range, test_bimap_sequenced test_bimap_unconstrained, test_bimap_unordered, typeof, xpressive
[ hp_cxx-71_006_tru64 ] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- foreach, test_bimap_info, test_bimap_ordered, test_bimap_unordered
I am working blind here because I do not have access to these platforms. I wish Boost.Bimap could support them for Boost 1.35. Is there somebody willing to help me cleaning this regressions?
Best regards Matias _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost