Things that go into sets must be less-than-able. The operators less than are in in tuple_comparison.hpp. Add that and your example works.... -t On Sep 1, 2004, at 12:52 AM, Trey Jackson wrote:
All,
I was trying to use the tuple in a set, and the STL complained about not having an operator&() - I think.
My question is, is tuple supposed to be usable in a set?
I read the STL docs: no mention of operator&() required. I tried both STLport and gcc's stl.
I'm using gcc 3.2.2, and the snippet of code is real easy:
,---------------- | #include <boost/tuple/tuple.hpp> | #include <set> | | using namespace std; | | using namespace boost; | | int | main(int, char *[]) | { | typedef tuple<int, int, int> Things; | | std::set<Things> mySet; | | Things oneThing(1,2,3); | mySet.insert(oneThing); | | return 0; | } `----------------
tia,
TJ
-- Trey Jackson tjackson@ichips.intel.com
"Nobody can give you wiser advice than yourself." -- Cicero _______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost