25 Feb
2009
25 Feb
'09
9:20 p.m.
----- Original Message ----- From: "Thorsten Ottosen" <thorsten.ottosen@dezide.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2009 10:07 PM Subject: Re: [boost] Formal Review: Boost.RangeEx
vicente.botet skrev:
As unique exist already, what about unique_view. With the _view suffix we state clearly that the evaluation is lazy.
Just to make sure there is no confusion on this point, then the orignal _ed suffix was supposed to mean "lazy". That doesn't mean it is perfect naming scheme, of course.
Of course, this don't mean it is perfect, but who is looking for perfection ;-) Vicente