[boost] Re: boost v 1.33 ?

Robert Ramey writes: [...]

In my view the release should be a much simpler affair than it has been in the past. I would like to see

a) an announce ment to refrain checking in anything other than bug fixes to pass tests. b) this "quiet period" would be about 10 days or until the test matrix is at acceptable level. c) The release would be "cut"

The fact that release contains only one new library and other minor changes hopefully would make this process relatively un dramatic.

The above assumes that *the main trunk* is in the good state, and it's not -- http://www.meta-comm.com/engineering/boost-regression/developer/summary.html (red shows regressions against 1.32.0). -- Aleksey Gurtovoy MetaCommunications Engineering