On 15/12/2010 13:34, Dean Michael Berris wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Mathias Gaunard <mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
On 15/12/2010 01:44, Edward Diener wrote:
Maybe the lack of interest is because this means little to me, and may mean little to others. If you have a library you need to tell people how to get it. I found a Soc 2009 home page and I still have no idea how one is supposed to see what is there or how to get your library.
There have been emails about it regularly on this mailing list for the past year and a half.
Searching this list for Unicode should give you many hits. The docs are here, if that's what you're looking for: <http://mathias.gaunard.com/unicode/doc/html/>
This is just beautiful -- I think this is exactly what I need in cpp-netlib! Will this be submitted to Boost for review soon, because I really want to be able to deal with UTF-8 real soon now. :D
It could be submitted soon if I gave it a bit of love. If my talk about it gets accepted for boostcon 2011, I will definitely have it in the review queue several months before it starts.
Very strange. You mention your library as possibly being more complete but then you tout someone else's. OK, I will study Artyom's Boost.Locale instead.
My library is more powerful in a way, but is also less polished and feature-complete.
So, what are the features you'd like to implement so that us potential users can be the judge of whether it's feature-complete enough?
- I need to finish support for word, sentence and line boundaries - The ABI needs to be more clearly defined to guarantee backward and upward compatibility - The convert and segment subsystem must be clearly separated into its own library and namespace - The system must be made SIMD-ready - Simple case conversion should be added - General case folding (and maybe collation) should be added Nothing among these is particularly difficult.