6 Mar
2005
6 Mar
'05
4:05 p.m.
"Alexander Nasonov" wrote:
This is more a problem of proposed Boost.FSM then yours. In my opition, too many things are put in state definition and too much a user has to remember:
1 curiously recurring template pattern 2 forward declaration of events 3 state context 4 transitions and other reactions 5 other advanced features (only for advanced user)
I think some of them should be defined somewhere else.
Would you mind to write review or just list of problems and whether/how they can be solved? I am prepared to wait for opinions after review period ends. What role do you see for your system from: http://aspn.activestate.com/ASPN/Mail/Message/boost/2176732 ? /Pavel