6 Jul
2009
6 Jul
'09
9:11 p.m.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Monday 06 July 2009, Zachary Turner wrote:
Making major interface changes to existing libraries is always inherently risky but is there any reason that adding a policy to shared_ptr, with a default policy template argument that uses the existing ref counting strategy, would be bad?
The FAQ of the shared_ptr documentation addresses this question. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkpSaH0ACgkQ5vihyNWuA4VAjQCgkhd0/dlTLHukJxGADLC4DUfG fmcAn27Ggst7A8rQcy/5mgfhnYYVczZT =dcNY -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----