18 Nov
2004
18 Nov
'04
6:02 p.m.
Gennadiy Rozental wrote:
"Daniel Wallin" <dalwan01@student.umu.se> wrote in message news:cnidaq$tim$1@sea.gmane.org...
IMO, a runtime error here is just not acceptable.
I disagree. I don't see compile-time error as an advantage here, but only a burden. I very much prefer to be able to write
I'm sorry but that just doesn't make sense... You are basically saying that, straight C++, if you have... void foo(int arg1, int arg2); And I use it as... foo(1); That C++ should give me a runtime error instead of the compiler doing the syntax checking. Are you serious? -- -- Grafik - Don't Assume Anything -- Redshift Software, Inc. - http://redshift-software.com -- rrivera/acm.org - grafik/redshift-software.com - 102708583/icq