In my particular case (serialization) I have a regression on test_shared_ptr. This test builds and runs correctly on both the borland compilers I have here. So as far as I'm concerned its not expected. Another test test_no_rtti fails on the test matrix at compile time. On my machine it fails on runtime (borland 5.64) or compiles and passes (borland 5.51). My inclination is just to leave these without any markup at all as I really don't know what I should be expecting. Robert Ramey John Maddock wrote:
Otto, can the last few regressions for the range lib be fixed (http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-RC_1_33_0/developer/is...) or should these just be marked up as expected?
Thanks,
John.
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost