29 May
2004
29 May
'04
8:50 p.m.
E. Gladyshev wrote:
I think that fsm should at the very least allow you to disable catch(...) and let unhandled exceptions go unhandled. Is ExceptionTranslator the best place to do that?
I think so. I believe the default ExceptionTranslator must not catch any exceptions. For the reasons you stated, only this solution is absolutely safe w.r.t unhandled exceptions. So the library will by default not provide any exception handling support (apart from terminating when an action throws). Regards, Andreas