3 Jun
2005
3 Jun
'05
7:13 p.m.
christopher diggins <cdiggins@videotron.ca> writes:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Neal Becker" <ndbecker2@gmail.com>
Here's my version:
[snip]
That code looks great! Any reason it can't go into boost as is? I would like to see that and a version which takes the step as a template parameter, to improve efficiency when the step size is known at compile-time.
A. there are no tests B. What about the undefined behavior that results when you stride off the end of a container? -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com