29 Jun
2007
29 Jun
'07
1:32 p.m.
Daniel James wrote:
I've seen the proposal to remove destroy, construct and address, and I think it's a good idea but it seems premature to remove them before the change has even been added to a draft standard.
Yes, it was a bit premature, but I didn't know anyone was using unordered+interprocess. I can add construct/destroy again to the allocators to make them compatible (I'm preparing a new version for the next week), but avoiding construct/destroy in unordered containers might be good idea to clean up a bit the implementation once the removal is added to the draft. Regards, Ion