On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:43 AM, Dave Abrahams <dave@boostpro.com> wrote:
At Mon, 24 Jan 2011 16:34:54 -0500, Chad Nelson wrote:
Sure, however I personally don't see the value of making the encoding an intrinsic property of a string object. [...]
Then I think we have different purposes, and I'll absent myself from this part of the discussion after this reply.
I think there *might* be a miscommunication here. IIUC, Dean is saying that he doesn't necessarily see a reason that a string's encoding needs to be exposed in its interface.
+1 And not only that, that viewing a string in a given encoding is largely a concern for a different type. I'm largely looking at how Fusion does it with sequences and views. -- Dean Michael Berris about.me/deanberris