12 Jan
2013
12 Jan
'13
11:04 p.m.
Le 12/01/13 19:20, Tim Blechmann a écrit :
but i wonder: is it a problem to link boost.thread with boost.atomic?
This was the question I made on my first post. If users don't find that this is a breaking change I will just replace uintmax_atomic_t by atomic<uintmax_t> which seems simple of all the versions. If the boost community find that this is a breaking change I will fix it conditionally. This is the concern of my post. The Andrey's post let me thought that we could do something that doesn't change the way the users uses the library, but it seems that there are some cases that will need that user link with. Best, Vicente