vicente.botet wrote:
----- Original Message ----- From: "Denis Shevchenko" <for.dshevchenko@gmail.com> To: <boost@lists.boost.org> Sent: Saturday, January 15, 2011 9:56 PM Subject: Re: [boost] namespace boost?
I find useful to have the file that include all the other files at the boost directory level. As it is the case for Boost.Flyweight
#include<boost/flyweight.hpp> Hmm... But what if I want to update one header-only library? If I have 'common' file that include all the other files at the boost
16.01.2011 00:49, vicente.botet ?????: directory level, I must replace this file AND own directory. But if all files placed in own directory, I replacing only it.
You are right, and I forget often to replace this file, but usualy it doesn't changes to much. The ideal will be that this file include a all.hpp file included on the library directory. Other have proposed someting like
#include<boost/flyweight/all.hpp>
or #include <boost/flyweight/include.hpp> for the convenience header. actually, I might be ok with each library permitting ONE #include<boost/flyweight.hpp> // convenience header. I though I would prefer the former. My normal practice is not to use these anyway but rather pick out the specific one's I'm interested in. So it's not a huge issue for me. The reason I do this is that I like knowing that I'm including only the minimum required to get the job done. I recognise that tastes differ on this. oh well.
Vicente
_______________________________________________ Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost