Joaquín Mª López Muñoz <joaquin@tid.es> writes:
Thorsten Ottosen ha escrito:
Dear all,
I will soon start to write some more documentation for the indirect container library (formerly called the smart container library). Before I start on that I would like to get a vote on the preferred naming of
1. the library itself 2. library classes
Ad 1: library name: --------------------
Boost.Indirect Cotainer was suggested by Joaquin. It sounds reasonable to me. I don't have any alternatives, but suggestions are welcome.
Maybe Boost Pointer Containers would also do, specially if you keep the ptr_xxx names.
I've heard the term "pointainer" somewhere. Not that I like it or anything. I believe "indirect" is superior -- I am assuming containers of dereferenceable types other than pointers (like iterators) are also supported. -- Dave Abrahams Boost Consulting www.boost-consulting.com