On Sat, Apr 14, 2012 at 6:00 AM, Mathias Gaunard < mathias.gaunard@ens-lyon.org> wrote:
On 13/04/12 19:31, Jeffrey Lee Hellrung, Jr. wrote:
I seem to remember this being discussed at length in the past...I believe
this thread?
http://boost.2283326.n4.**nabble.com/boost-exception-** detail-error-info-base-does-**not-have-virtual-destructor-** td3384903.html<http://boost.2283326.n4.nabble.com/boost-exception-detail-error-info-base-does-not-have-virtual-destructor-td3384903.html>
Yes, basically, the author said he didn't care and it wasn't virtual by design, and the compiler warning was bogus.
My personal opinion about this warning aside, I do want to suppress it. I simply can't reproduce it, and nobody has provided me with code that reproduces the problem. If you see the warning, grab the code and post it in the bug tracker. Emil Dotchevski Reverge Studios, Inc. http://www.revergestudios.com/reblog/index.php?n=ReCode