
10 Jun
2005
10 Jun
'05
3:58 a.m.
Stefan Seefeld wrote:
The '>>' notation suggests an ordering of the packets, which doesn't exist.
The ordering of operator>> is as counter-intuitive as the ordering of calls to send(). If people can get used to the idea that the first send() may arrive after the second, they will get used to the same idea with operator syntax. -- Pedro Lamarão