Re: [boost] [Bug Sprint] Ticket #2867 - Adding a get_expected_args member to format

AMDG Joel Falcou wrote:

https://svn.boost.org/trac/boost/ticket/2867

This ticket has a working patch + test attached. Should be merged and closed.

I don't like the name. I would prefer expected_args(). basic_format already has str (not get_str) and exceptions (not get_exceptions). It has getloc, but there is no _. Altogether, I think that expected_args is more consistent. In Christ, Steven Watanabe