Peter Dimov wrote:
Joel de Guzman wrote:
I disagree with your assumption that "People who have not yet voted are now more likely vote for the currently posted top candidates". This assumption is simply flawed. I also disagree with your statement that "This has nothing to do with intelligence". Of course it has.
You are wrong on both counts. Statement #1 is true because people may only look at the tally page. Statement #2 is true because this is due to lack of time, not lack of intelligence.
Ehm, you are missing an "in my opinion" there somewhere ;-) Ok, I respect your opinion. It's just not true, IMO. I certainly don't fall under that catogory, and I have a strong belief in the people here at boost. I repeat again, I have a firm belief that the people here at boost *are* trend setters, *not* dumb followers, as those statements suggest. Lack of time? C'mon! You can do better than that. We spend lots of time doing free work! Choosing a logo is a very important task for someone *intelligent* enough to grasp the significance of such a thing. And, needless to say, Boost folks *are* intelligent. Cheers, -- Joel de Guzman http://www.boost-consulting.com http://spirit.sf.net