
3 Mar
2010
3 Mar
'10
6:38 p.m.
Jeffrey Hellrung wrote:
I would prefer the replace_* and propagate_* combination, but I'm not gonna go ax someone over it. I'll go along with whatever the maintainer (John?) prefers.
Actually, on second thought, I'd probably prefer copy_* and propagate_*, given that "replace" seems to have a "search-and-replace" connotation (again, looking at std::replace), which doesn't seem to quite fit here. Now I'm just mumbling... - Jeff