Re: [boost] [optional] Safe optional

On Thu, Nov 20, 2014 at 5:00 AM, Andrzej Krzemienski wrote:

the docs also recommends NOT to use optional<T> to signal a potential error/difficulty in computing T: http://www.boost.org/doc/libs/1_57_0/libs/optional/doc/html/boost_optional/t... .

This is the choice made for optional<T>. The authors of expected may want to choose a different model.

expected is almost surely written for exactly that purpose. Tony