[boost] Re: [type_traits] function_traits and functors

Jonathan Turkanis wrote:

I'm interested, and will try to look at it eventually, but am too busy now. Just a quick question: does your proposal use template template parameters in an essential way, or was that just part of the snipped example? If so, it will likely impede mpl interoperability.

No. That was just part of the snippet example ;+). The submission is just a collection of metafunctions missing in the Type Traits library, so far - and (hopefully) a boostified replacement of the "mpl-unfriendly" function_traits class. Regards, Tobias