Hi Gaurav, On Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:04:55 +0530, Gaurav.Jain@iflexsolutions.com said:
Based on this information I have replaced all the occurrences of msg.msg_control = 0; msg.msg_controllen = 0; msg.msg_flags = 0; With msg.msg_accrights = 0; msg.msg_accrightslen = 0;
Actually I think it would be better for now to do as Oliver suggests and find the correct #define to use to enable X/Open compliance. As I said before, at this stage I want to avoid changing actual code before I release 0.3.8 as far as is possible.
Number of errors have come down to 3 on Solaris 10. boost/1_33_1/64/boost/array.hpp", line 74: Error: Too few arguments for template std::reverse_iterator<boost::T*>. "/boost/1_33_1/64/boost/array.hpp", line 166: Where: While specializing "boost::array<boost::T, boost::N>". "/boost/1_33_1/64/boost/array.hpp", line 166: Where: Specialized in non-template code. "/boost/1_33_1/64/boost/array.hpp", line 75: Error: Too few arguments for template std::reverse_iterator<const boost::T*>. "/boost/1_33_1/64/boost/array.hpp", line 166: Where: While specializing "boost::array<boost::T, boost::N>". "/boost/1_33_1/64/boost/array.hpp", line 166: Where: Specialized in non-template code.
This seems to be an issue between boost::array and the Sun compiler, and not to do with asio as such. I see the same errors in the regression logs for boost CVS HEAD: http://engineering.meta-comm.com/boost-regression/CVS-HEAD/developer/output/...
"daytime_client.cpp", line 24: Error: The operation It seems "std::ostream<<boost::asio::error" is illegal.
Are you sure the daytime_client.cpp source you are using is the one written for 0.3.8? That line number and error message corresponds to the 0.3.7 source. Cheers, Chris