22 Dec
2008
22 Dec
'08
11:27 p.m.
Scott McMurray wrote:
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 11:44, Andy Tompkins <atompkins@fastmail.fm> wrote:
Here is what I see the interface looking like based on feedback from the review so far. It would, of course, be split into different header files.
I like it.
// no default constructor private: uuid();
Great in theory, but I think it'll break lexical_cast<uuid>("21f7f8de-8051-5b89-8680-0195ef798b6a"), since the lexical_cast wants to default-construct the target type into which it will read.
Could the relevant lexical_cast overloads be made friends so they can use the default constructor? John Bytheway